Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> TIE Interceptors. by Boozegood on Jul 15,2011 1:48pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 1:48pm
Best in the fleet.

"Your generic TIE grunt is just plain suicidal. And the TIE Defender jockey is bloodthirsty. But the TIE Interceptor pilot, he's suicidal and bloodthirsty. When you see a squad of those maniacs flying your way, you'd better hope your hyperdrive is operational."

―Kyle Katarn







toggletoggle post by Mark R at Jul 15,2011 1:49pm
I wouldn't mess with one unless I was in an A-Wing.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 1:54pm
A-wing Vs. TIE Interceptor is the sickest dog fight in Star Wars in my opinion.

GEEKIN'OUT.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 2:12pm
A wing of 3 TIE Interceptors versus The Defiant. Who wins?



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 2:12pm
also: PEW! PEW! PEW!



toggletoggle post by Mark R at Jul 15,2011 2:31pm
heh, you posted what I was thinking



toggletoggle post by Fuck_logging_in at Jul 15,2011 2:41pm
wouldn't they all be clones with the exact same personality? Or in episodes 1-3 no longer canon?



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 2:42pm
Fuck_logging_in said[orig][quote]
wouldn't they all be clones with the exact same personality? Or in episodes 1-3 no longer canon?


Clone troopers don't have the exact same personalities at all.

Also, the Imperial Army, Navy and Stormtrooper Corps had almost no Clones left in it by the time the TIE Interceptor was around.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 2:43pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
A wing of 3 TIE Interceptors versus The Defiant. Who wins?


The Defiant for sure easily, no problem.



toggletoggle post by arkquimanthorn at Jul 15,2011 2:45pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
A wing of 3 TIE Interceptors versus The Defiant. Who wins?


The Defiant, before the TIEs are even in firing range. The Defiant can destroy planets. Let's stick to one franchise here, pal.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Jul 15,2011 2:47pm
INTERCEPTORS ARE WEAK FAGGOT SHIT




toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 2:49pm
bobnomaamrooney said[orig][quote]
INTERCEPTORS ARE WEAK FAGGOT SHIT



TALKIN' BOUT FIGHTERS HERE BRAH!


I did just order a LEGO Slave I though, woooo.



toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard  at Jul 15,2011 2:51pm




toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard  at Jul 15,2011 2:52pm
yeah I made that just now at work...WHAT OF IT?



toggletoggle post by ark at Jul 15,2011 2:54pm
Hahaha



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 2:54pm
Okay, rephrasing question: How many TIE Interceptors would it take to be a fair match. Keep in mind that the Defiant can only acquire so many targets at once and the quantum torpedoes, though extremely powerful, are overkill for a tiny TIE craft. The big question is whether or not TIE blasters have any effect on the Defiant's shields.



toggletoggle post by KEVORD  at Jul 15,2011 2:55pm
Slave 1 never made the Kessel Run in less then 12 Parsecs.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 2:57pm
The M-Falcon was suped up with aftermarket drives, etc. Doesn't count.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Jul 15,2011 2:58pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
The M-Falcon was suped up with aftermarket drives, etc. Doesn't count.


Fact, the Kessel Run is analogous to Revere Beach Parkway. Millennium Falcon was a ricer.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 2:59pm
Also that doesn't make sense. It's like saying "I ran a marathon in 12 miles."



toggletoggle post by ark at Jul 15,2011 3:00pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
Okay, rephrasing question: How many TIE Interceptors would it take to be a fair match. Keep in mind that the Defiant can only acquire so many targets at once and the quantum torpedoes, though extremely powerful, are overkill for a tiny TIE craft. The big question is whether or not TIE blasters have any effect on the Defiant's shields.

That's tough. It would have to be a tie swarm and it would have to take acceptable losses. Plus ties don't have warp. I don't know their weapon loadout other than lasers, which became obsolete in the Trek universe way before the Defiant was built. So...



toggletoggle post by NuclearWinter at Jul 15,2011 3:00pm
Pfft, my other car is the Ebon Hawk.



toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard  at Jul 15,2011 3:01pm
we all know a parsec is not a measure of time! It is a measure of distance...however, Han is actually referring to the shorter route he was able to travel by skirting the nearby Maw black hole cluster, thus making the run in under the standard distance.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 3:09pm edited Jul 15,2011 3:10pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
Okay, rephrasing question: How many TIE Interceptors would it take to be a fair match. Keep in mind that the Defiant can only acquire so many targets at once and the quantum torpedoes, though extremely powerful, are overkill for a tiny TIE craft. The big question is whether or not TIE blasters have any effect on the Defiant's shields.


TOUGH ONE, but, before all that, even if the TIE's could get through the Defiants shield, the Defiant is just SO MUCH BIGGER, how much of an effect would the quad cannons (assuming the engineers on the Star Destroyer didn't apply powercores and activate the duel cannons on fuselage as well) do to the Defiant? They would be chipping away at her for quite some time, givin' Worf (assuming he's in command, which he should be) ample time to take them out.


EDIT: Meaning it would take a shit load of TIEs to even take down an un-shielded Defiant.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 3:12pm
The Defiant is mega-stacked as well.

Armaments:
Pulsed and beam phasers
Photon torpedoes
Quantum torpedoes

Defenses: Deflector shields
Cloaking device



toggletoggle post by Yeti at Jul 15,2011 3:20pm
only Tenn Graneet is real.



toggletoggle post by Doomkid   at Jul 15,2011 3:22pm
NuclearWinter said[orig][quote]
Pfft, my other car is the Ebon Hawk.


Have fun with your ancient cargo hauler.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 3:28pm
Again different universes. The lasers in Star Wars were more powerful than the lasers in Star Trek. Perhaps the Star Wars weapon is just a catch-all term. Though it seems that SW lasers are still slightly less powerful than ST phasers.

"The phasers on the USS Enterprise could stun entire city blocks full of people[8] and even destroy entire asteroids up to a given size."

"SFS L-s7.2 laser cannon, it had the power to destroy small asteroids in one shot."



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 3:30pm
KEVORD said[orig][quote]
Slave 1 never made the Kessel Run in less then 12 Parsecs.


Mutis said[orig][quote]
Also that doesn't make sense. It's like saying "I ran a marathon in 12 miles."


AHHH-HAH! Not so, young padawan.

As per the Han Solo trilogy; the Kessel Run is more or less suicidal because it's a black hole field. Solo gets chased into it by Imps, and slingshots the MF through the edge of a couple black holes' gravity fields, thereby bending space and completing the run in less than the standard distance thought possible. CONTINUITY PRESERVED.

That, or a wizard did it.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 3:32pm
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
KEVORD said[orig][quote]
Slave 1 never made the Kessel Run in less then 12 Parsecs.


Mutis said[orig][quote]
Also that doesn't make sense. It's like saying "I ran a marathon in 12 miles."


AHHH-HAH! Not so, young padawan.

As per the Han Solo trilogy; the Kessel Run is more or less suicidal because it's a black hole field. Solo gets chased into it by Imps, and slingshots the MF through the edge of a couple black holes' gravity fields, thereby bending space and completing the run in less than the standard distance thought possible. CONTINUITY PRESERVED.

That, or a wizard did it.


KEHD, we both lost our opportunities to be fanboys when Andrew beat us too it. UNFAIR THAT YOU DID IT ANYWAYS.

GUYS, GUYS, I KnEW THiS TOO, GUYS...GUYs...? :(



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 3:34pm
Also, only the TIE Advanced X1 is real.




toggletoggle post by Yeti at Jul 15,2011 3:38pm
we have a model of that in our band room as a security precaution. go ahead, break in, see what happens.



toggletoggle post by Randy_Marsh at Jul 15,2011 3:39pm



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Jul 15,2011 3:46pm
Bitchesdont know shit about my interceptors.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 3:49pm
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
KEVORD said[orig][quote]
Slave 1 never made the Kessel Run in less then 12 Parsecs.


Mutis said[orig][quote]
Also that doesn't make sense. It's like saying "I ran a marathon in 12 miles."


AHHH-HAH! Not so, young padawan.

As per the Han Solo trilogy; the Kessel Run is more or less suicidal because it's a black hole field. Solo gets chased into it by Imps, and slingshots the MF through the edge of a couple black holes' gravity fields, thereby bending space and completing the run in less than the standard distance thought possible. CONTINUITY PRESERVED.

That, or a wizard did it.


Doesn't matter because:

1) The MF had nothing to do with it. It was Han's piloting skill and ingenuity that did it.

2) Even if he took this shortcut, why would he brag about distance rather than time? The most obvious answer is that there was faulty logic in the screen play, or it was another one of Harrison's adlibs that had to later be explained when the fans got pissed. Kinda like the Heisenberg compensator (which was later found to be unneeded by theoretical physicists anyway). I also don't buy the "slingshot" thing. Momentum gained is also lost plus additional energy due to friction. Star Trek also made this error in the Voyage Home when they tried to "slingshot" around the sun. Bullshit.



toggletoggle post by Yeti at Jul 15,2011 3:56pm
i have the answer. he's Han Solo. DO NOT QUESTION.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Jul 15,2011 3:56pm
ITT: Evidence we're all incredibly lucky to have ever touched a boob or vagina.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 3:59pm
My girlfriend had never seen star trek before meeting me. Now she's obsessed.



toggletoggle post by bobnomaamrooney at Jul 15,2011 4:00pm
Same here, we made plans to go out to dinner with some of her friends a few months ago and ended up cancelling to watch six hours of ST:TNG.



toggletoggle post by arkquimanthorn at Jul 15,2011 4:02pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
I also don't buy the "slingshot" thing. Momentum gained is also lost plus additional energy due to friction. Star Trek also made this error in the Voyage Home when they tried to "slingshot" around the sun. Bullshit.


Yeah, not really knowing much about aerospace travel, I still say that you could use a celestial body's orbit to turn, but you wouldn't gain additional speed in doing it. However, the game changes if we're talking about something reaching infinite mass, like a black hole, where space-time becomes warped. So Han could have used the space-time irregularities to his advantage, effectively shrinking the distance he traveled through the Kessel Run.



toggletoggle post by arkquimanthorn at Jul 15,2011 4:04pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
My girlfriend had never seen star trek before meeting me. Now she's obsessed.
same, aside from watching TNG when she was a kid, yeah, obsessed might be the word.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 4:04pm



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 4:09pm
Boozegood said[orig][quote]
KEHD, we both lost our opportunities to be fanboys when Andrew beat us too it. UNFAIR THAT YOU DID IT ANYWAYS.

GUYS, GUYS, I KnEW THiS TOO, GUYS...GUYs...? :(


GODDAMMIT

arkquimanthorn said[orig][quote]
Yeah, not really knowing much about aerospace travel, I still say that you could use a celestial body's orbit to turn, but you wouldn't gain additional speed in doing it.


Yeah, Tully beat me to it, but that's an actual thing. BABY, IMMA SLINGSHOT MY DEEP SPACE PROBE AROUND YOUR CELESTIAL BODY.

also,

bobnomaamrooney said[orig][quote]
ITT: Evidence we're all incredibly lucky to have ever touched a boob or vagina.



toggletoggle post by arkquimanthorn at Jul 15,2011 4:10pm
Boozegood said[orig][quote]
The Defiant is mega-stacked as well.

Armaments:
Pulsed and beam phasers
Photon torpedoes
Quantum torpedoes

Defenses: Deflector shields
Cloaking device


Right, I completely forgot about the cloaking device, that's a huge tactical advantage. You would need a swarm of TIEi's to make a dent after they're ambushed. The TIE pilots may be bloodthirsty and suicidal, but the Defiant has two of the baddest niggas in the galaxy on the bridge, Sisko and Worf. Plus, the Defiant is one of the fastest and most agile warships in the Federation fleet, which has to count for something, even versus a swarm of TIEs, and especially against a Star Destroyer.



toggletoggle post by arkquimanthorn at Jul 15,2011 4:12pm
Boozegood said[orig][quote]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_assist


of fucking course, i stand wiki'd




toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 4:14pm
arkquimanthorn said[orig][quote]
Right, I completely forgot about the cloaking device, that's a huge tactical advantage. You would need a swarm of TIEi's to make a dent after they're ambushed. The TIE pilots may be bloodthirsty and suicidal, but the Defiant has two of the baddest niggas in the galaxy on the bridge, Sisko and Worf. Plus, the Defiant is one of the fastest and most agile warships in the Federation fleet, which has to count for something, even versus a swarm of TIEs, and especially against a Star Destroyer.


"We'll last longer than we will against that Death Star! And we might just take a few of them with us."




toggletoggle post by FuckIsMySignature at Jul 15,2011 4:16pm
found my halloween costume




toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 4:25pm
arkquimanthorn said[orig][quote]
Boozegood said[orig][quote]
The Defiant is mega-stacked as well.

Armaments:
Pulsed and beam phasers
Photon torpedoes
Quantum torpedoes

Defenses: Deflector shields
Cloaking device


Right, I completely forgot about the cloaking device, that's a huge tactical advantage. You would need a swarm of TIEi's to make a dent after they're ambushed. The TIE pilots may be bloodthirsty and suicidal, but the Defiant has two of the baddest niggas in the galaxy on the bridge, Sisko and Worf. Plus, the Defiant is one of the fastest and most agile warships in the Federation fleet, which has to count for something, even versus a swarm of TIEs, and especially against a Star Destroyer.


Not to mention you could argue for freakin' Starfleet-Pussery and say they would need to yield after so many civvies got wacked, but the Defiant is one of the only WARMACHINNENEENEEE only ships in Starfleet.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 4:35pm
Okay yeah I forgot about the planetary body's direction. But are we really to believe that every black hole and their spin in this "black hole field" are moving in the same direction? fat odds, yo. Not to mention, if you go past the event horizon, there's no escape. Not even Star Trek tech can. Also, warped space around a black hole will yield an exit velocity that is greater than the velocity added by the movement of the black hole.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 4:46pm
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!


bennyhillifier



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 4:49pm
Gotta love Trek. "Shit, how the fuck do we end this episode?" "IDK, have'em reverse the polarity on something." "DONE AND DONE."



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 4:50pm
http://www.daughtersoftiresias.org/progs/technobabble/index.cgi

Star Trek Technobabble Generator said
Picard: Quick, Data, do something!

Data: Yes, sir. I am currently pulsating the quadratonic control center to 849 joules to sautee the Federation marauder.

Picard: Will it work?

Data: I don't know. It's never been done before.

Data: Sir, we seem to be having a problem. The axial wave guide is out of virtual memory. It looks like the work of Ferangi.

Picard: Mr. Data, is there anything you can do to fix this?

Data: I am channeling all available resources into transferring power to the orbital microsomething or other to 22 delta-v to enslave the first officer. That should hopefully fix the problem.

Picard: Make it so.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 4:51pm
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
Gotta love Trek. "Shit, how the fuck do we end this episode?" "IDK, have'em reverse the polarity on something." "DONE AND DONE."


HAHA, was JUST watching 'The Sword of Kahless' on youtube wherein they of course reversed the polarity on a force-field to get through.

In the comments: "Reverse the polarity. Its like the Star Trek version of Duct Tape."



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 4:55pm
liek button



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 4:57pm
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
http://www.daughtersoftiresias.org/progs/technobabble/index.cgi


Thiiisss isss awesommeee, haha.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 5:00pm
Boozegood said[orig][quote]
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
http://www.daughtersoftiresias.org/progs/technobabble/index.cgi


Thiiisss isss awesommeee, haha.

My tricorder is picking up traces of lulz particles.



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 5:01pm
DestroyYouAlot said[orig][quote]
http://www.daughtersoftiresias.org/progs/technobabble/index.cgi

Star Trek Technobabble Generator said
Picard: Quick, Data, do something!

Data: Yes, sir. I am currently emitting the photon gluon coolant sensor by anti-masticating the nanomanifold to proselytise to the Cardascian *camper*.

Picard: Will it work?

Data: I don't know. It's never been done before.

Data: Sir, we seem to be having a problem. The field integrity field prematurely terminated. It looks like the work of meddeling Q.

Picard: Mr. Data, is there anything you can do to fix this?

Data: I am channeling all available resources into bypassing the subspace release to escape from the temporal phenomenon. That should hopefully fix the problem.

Picard: Make it so.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 5:03pm
"The field integrity field"


Hahahaha.



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 5:05pm
This star wars thread was hijacked by trekkies. Can't say it makes me sad.



toggletoggle post by Doomkid   at Jul 15,2011 5:12pm
Take Star Trek/Star Wars as a dialectic or GTFO



toggletoggle post by Doomkid   at Jul 15,2011 5:14pm
Also:

Picard: Quick, Data, do something!

Data: Yes, sir. I am currently re-BSing the variable suspension to vaporize the freighter.

Picard: Will it work?

Data: I don't know. It's never been done before.

Data: Sir, we seem to be having a problem. The rapid scanner shut down. It looks like the work of mathematicians.

Picard: Mr. Data, is there anything you can do to fix this?

Data: I am channeling all available resources into phasing the quark overflow to harass the child. That should hopefully fix the problem.

Picard: Make it so.



toggletoggle post by Boozegood at Jul 15,2011 5:14pm
Mutis said[orig][quote]
This star wars thread was hijacked by trekkies. Can't say it makes me sad.


I AM BOTH.



toggletoggle post by Yeti at Jul 15,2011 5:16pm
ALL TREKKIES SHALL BE CAST INTO THE PIT OF CARKOON



toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 5:17pm
I transcend both.



toggletoggle post by DestroyYouAlot  at Jul 15,2011 5:18pm
lol @ "phasing the quark overflow to harass the child".




toggletoggle post by Mutis  at Jul 15,2011 5:18pm
Also, I'm a fan of flame wars between trekkies and star wars fanatics.



toggletoggle post by Sacreligion at Jul 15,2011 5:24pm
THIS THREAD IS RACIST




Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:Clotted Apocalyptic Wargod
[default homepage] [print][8:03:25pm Apr 28,2024
load time 0.05487 secs/15 queries]
[search][refresh page]