Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Lets see if this fails as hard as the rest of my threads. by Doomkid on Aug 31,2010 9:21pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by Doomkid   at Aug 31,2010 9:21pm
In general it seems that most people on this board feel that either our government is not following the Constitution correctly or that our executive/legislative/judicial system as a whole needs an overhaul.

So I'd like to know: would anyone support a new Constitutional Convention to try an transform our foundational document into something that more directly deals with modern problems? Something that could perhaps be written in such a way as to allow easier interpretation for future unforeseen problems? (ie: as our oil-powered civilization was unforseen by the original Framers)

On the other hand whoever was composing it would be under more political and financial pressure than any composer of legislation in history. So it could, without hyperbole, epically fail.

Thoughts/



toggletoggle post by blue  at Aug 31,2010 9:22pm
in b4 hippie commie pinko socialist faggotz you all are



toggletoggle post by Dankill at Aug 31,2010 9:29pm
blue said[orig][quote]
in b4 hippie commie pinko socialist faggotz you all are
Cum on Blue balls?!



toggletoggle post by ShadowSD  at Aug 31,2010 9:36pm
I vote for epic fail.

The Constitution can be amended, but I don't think we could do better than the original document as a starting point, and odds are somewhere between more than likely to almost definite we would do worse.

I hated this idea when Perot suggested it and I remain convinced it would be THE WORST THING EVER. I agree with Jefferson in each generation having the right to rewrite in theory but it will be some time until that theory is relevant in practice, it may be centuries (if we make it that long) until such a need is realized. If we by some rare chance in the futre met other sentient life that reshaped our understanding of rights and the universe, that might qualify; I still find it hard to believe such a thing will ever happen though, except perhaps with artifical intelligence gaining sentience. But we'll almost definitely all kill ourselves before we get NEAR that point.



toggletoggle post by arilliusbm  at Aug 31,2010 9:38pm
I vote... let me get back on this



toggletoggle post by arilliusbm  at Aug 31,2010 9:58pm
PS: your threads don't fail. you made the bova thread. (ORIGINAL)



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Aug 31,2010 10:01pm
the problem is that there are too many laws on the books to be enforced. Besides that, if you re-wrote the constitution, 70% of america wouldn't care and 25% would hate it and call you racist. I don't believe you are racist, I know you are racist... but that is besides the point.
the ten commandments were written in 1513 bc and no one's amended those you racist summabitch.



toggletoggle post by sxealex   at Aug 31,2010 10:15pm
arilliusbm said[orig][quote]
PS: your threads don't fail. you made the bova thread. (ORIGINAL)


beat me to it



toggletoggle post by metal_church101  at Sep 1,2010 12:34pm
ShadowSD said[orig][quote]
I vote for epic fail.

The Constitution can be amended, but I don't think we could do better than the original document as a starting point, and odds are somewhere between more than likely to almost definite we would do worse.

I hated this idea when Perot suggested it and I remain convinced it would be THE WORST THING EVER. I agree with Jefferson in each generation having the right to rewrite in theory but it will be some time until that theory is relevant in practice, it may be centuries (if we make it that long) until such a need is realized. If we by some rare chance in the futre met other sentient life that reshaped our understanding of rights and the universe, that might qualify; I still find it hard to believe such a thing will ever happen though, except perhaps with artifical intelligence gaining sentience. But we'll almost definitely all kill ourselves before we get NEAR that point.


I agree. We should just kill ourselves instead.



toggletoggle post by sxealex   at Sep 1,2010 12:55pm
yes mass suicide u first



toggletoggle post by MetrosexualiberaL at Sep 1,2010 2:30pm
Doomkid said[orig][quote]
So I'd like to know: would anyone support a new Constitutional Convention to try an transform our foundational document into something that more directly deals with modern problems? Something that could perhaps be written in such a way as to allow easier interpretation for future unforeseen problems?


What a wonderful, creative idea!

I think we should make welfare for the disenfranchised or historically disadvantaged our number one priority.

Think of the Africans, the poor noble Hispanics, the long-suffering Melungeons!



toggletoggle post by 666 TEA PARTY REVOLUTION 666 at Sep 1,2010 3:09pm
WE ALREADY HAVE THE CONSTITUTION, WE DON'T NEED TO RE-WRITE IT

YOU MEAN FUCK IT ALL UP

LIBERALS WANT THE CONSTITUTION TO BE PROMISES FROM THE GOVERNMENT TO THE LAZY!

I'LL SHOW YOU A TEA PARTY CONSTITUTION... IT'S MY .45



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:skynet is always watching protecting you
[default homepage] [print][3:59:40pm Apr 28,2024
load time 0.01647 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]