Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Wisdom from Varg by Joe/NotCommon on Oct 29,2004 9:54am
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Oct 29,2004 9:54am
Question by Tetsuro Yoshioka from Japan: What do You think about modern Muslim terrorism?


What on Earth do these Muslims think they are? Their very survival actually depends on the good-will of the so-called Western world. They should be happy the Western world doesn't decide to wipe them out entirely, and considering this possibility, provoking the USA with terror isn't a very good idea. It is not like they haven't wiped out people before (Native Americans, for instance). We already see people who argue that we should carpet bomb Mecca every time one of those Muslims fart in the wrong direction. We also see people who argue that we should just let Israel do whatever they want to "down there". Why should we care what happens to them when these Muslims threaten the lives of our children? The Arabs have no rights to that area anyhow: the Mesopotamian/Babylonian, Egyptian and Assyrian cultures weren't built by the Arabs. The Arabs came to these areas from the Saudi Peninsula in the VIIth century, that is hundreds of years after the last of the above mentioned Ancient cultures had ceased to exist in the first place. At least the Israelis have historical rights down there, even I can see that. Calling the Arabs "Palestinians" doesn't change that fact.

The problem with this terror is not the threat from terror, but how governments in the Western world react to it. They use it as an excuse to suppress their own citizens, with all kinds of surveillance and other security measures. They basically introduce a police state where the freedom of the citizens are dramatically reduced. What they should do, of course, would be to remove the threat of terror completely by throwing out all the Muslims. What on Earth are they doing here anyway?

Well, I can tell You what they are doing here: they practice their religion. Islam is an imperialistic religion and they know that the only way they can gain a world domination is by moving their followers to civilized, powerful and rich countries en masse. They breed like rats and if we let them stay it is just a matter of time before they become majority, and when that happens they don't need military power to gain control. Our weak and tolerant "democracy" makes sure of that. In Oslo 40% of all the children are such immigrants already!

In my paranoid mind it seems like somebody are letting these Muslims come and stay solely because they want to hold us hostage, so to speak. Would anybody fear Muslim terror if there were no Muslims in our own countries? Of course not! They are a threat solely because they live amongst us. Now who benefits from that? Israel certainly does, as more and more of us are inclined to let the Israelis do as they will "down there", because we are afraid of or grow tired of the Muslim scum (like always, I use very diplomatic terms…). Also, the rulers in the Western world benefit from this. They are able to secure their power, suppress their opposition and everybody who disagree with them, using the terror threat as an excuse to do it.

So, modern Muslim terrorism is a scam and we can and should solve this problem by throwing out all the Muslims from their countries - and give them a bullet in the back of their head if they should refuse to go voluntary (or if they don't get out fast enough). If we should decide to we can always just take whatever we want, like oil, from this scum anyhow - like Japan did in 1941 in Indonesia and the USA in Iraq recently. What are they going to do about it anyhow, throw rocks at us? They can fight back only if we let them. Read whatever You want to into that comment…

When that is done we should throw the Turks out of Europe too, and give the area back to the Greeks… (Is that what we call "warmongering"? if we didn't know any better somebody might think I was British…).



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Oct 29,2004 10:02am
Too bad Varg isn't running for president.
Bush using 9/11 as an excuse to pass the patriot act is pure evil. Even Varg can see through that.
Fuck Israel, let it burn.



toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Oct 29,2004 10:07am
Josh, you are the only person on this entire board who is anti-Bush and makes real points about why people shouldn't vote for him.

I am not voting for Bush, but I have stuck up for him because all the Kerry supporters (other then you) have done nothing but make retarded, false arguments about why Bush shouldn't be re-elected, probably because John Stewart said it was cool to support Kerry.

Anyways, good job.



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Oct 29,2004 10:40am
I know what you mean. There are other boards where I'll actually stick up for Bush a little because extreme left-wingers get annoying.
I don't particularly like Kerry, but I do 100% believe that Bush needs to be removed at any cost.
Even Pat Buchannan says he doesn't like how the republican party has gotten so intertwined with fanatical christianity. I mean when Pat fucking Buchannan says you're too religious, that really says something.



toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Oct 29,2004 10:44am
I like Pat Buchanan on alot of issues, but he would probably try to censor shit out of control.

What I mean is, on this board, you are the only person anti-Bush who has made any real argument against him. Everyone else just seems like uninformed bandwagon Bush-haters.



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Oct 29,2004 10:55am
Thanks. I do what I can. I wish I lived in a swing state. I would actually urge people in Mass to vote for a 3rd party because Kerry's got this state locked up anyways.

Also, VERY glad to hear you're not really voting for Bush.



toggletoggle post by Joe/NotCommon   at Oct 29,2004 11:02am
I am voting for libertarian



toggletoggle post by Christraper at Oct 29,2004 11:03am
Im still voting for Dio



toggletoggle post by Josh_Martin at Oct 29,2004 11:11am
Joe/NotCommon said:
I am voting for libertarian


Awesome.





toggletoggle post by My_Dying_Bride at Oct 29,2004 11:51am
Joe/NotCommon said:
Everyone else just seems like uninformed bandwagon Bush-haters.


truer words have never been spoken, thank you mr. not/common



toggletoggle post by WyrmFingerz   at Oct 29,2004 12:40pm
wow. this is awesome.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:you are signing your life away
[default homepage] [print][11:46:40am Apr 26,2024
load time 0.01360 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]