Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> guitar tone question by George on Aug 31,2004 8:26pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by George   at Aug 31,2004 8:26pm
what kind of setup does nasum use? rotten sound has the same guitar tone as well. i'm talking really really beefy and thick. lots of low end, but not so trebley that it's just chug sounds. it's full and bassy and thick as fuck. alot of grind bands have this kind of sound and i think it's awesome.
i dont like scooping my guitar cause it cuts out all the volume. but it sounds like it's scooped but there's something different about it.
anyone know anything about this?



toggletoggle post by Hooker  at Aug 31,2004 8:45pm
Not sure. That dude Mieszko looks like he has a shitty Ibanez RG or Satriani ripoff going into a rack. I couldn't find many live pictures of them and even then I still don't know what they used in the studio.


Tell me what you use for equipment and I'll try to help you out. Or I'll just insult you because I'm a dickheaded gear whore.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Aug 31,2004 8:46pm
the guitarist of rotten sound currently just sports an esp viper with an emg 81 in the bridge going to a dual rectifier. i cant really help much beyond that cus im really not a fan of the pickup or the head.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Aug 31,2004 9:27pm
use the Mode Four and oh it's got balls



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Aug 31,2004 9:34pm
mode four, meh. marshalls attempt at a dual rectifier in my opinion.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Aug 31,2004 9:38pm
still sounds good to me



toggletoggle post by Hooker  at Aug 31,2004 9:41pm
That mode four is embarrasing.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Aug 31,2004 9:44pm
you talk crazy talk



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Aug 31,2004 9:49pm
i dont talk crazy, but im pretty anti marshall. the jcm 900 was the last head i actually cared about from them.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Aug 31,2004 9:54pm
hmm i dont really care for Marshal either but i tried this amp and i liked it...i didnt care what brand it was, it sounded good



toggletoggle post by Dick_Bloodeye at Aug 31,2004 10:25pm
wow. an EMG 81 and recto...
creative.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Aug 31,2004 10:39pm
Dick_Bloodeye said:
wow. an EMG 81 and recto...
creative.


you read my mind.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Aug 31,2004 10:39pm
here i brought some extra cake......thank you for flying church of england



toggletoggle post by George   at Aug 31,2004 11:26pm
i use an ampeg v4b with a ratt pedal, for clean i use an eq pedal and lower everything so they're some gain but not alot.

im not nessicarily looking for that sound, i like not being over gainy, but i'm curious if i decide to. i'd like to have numerous guitar sounds.



toggletoggle post by RustedAngel at Aug 31,2004 11:41pm
no matter how much rack gear you have, you can't compare to the tone of a head.



toggletoggle post by George   at Sep 1,2004 12:25am
rotten sound didn't sound like that when i saw them live, so im thinking it may be a studio trick or something.

either way, its pretty awesome.

sean, sorry, but the mode four is pretty god awful.



toggletoggle post by RustedAngel at Sep 1,2004 1:21am
dave suzuki uses the mode 4, sounded pretty good to me.



toggletoggle post by RustedAngel at Sep 1,2004 1:24am
blue nli said:
mode four, meh. marshalls attempt at a dual rectifier in my opinion.



how is it an attempt at being a dual rec if the mode four doesn't even have a power tube section? all it has is a couple ecc83's.

I still haven't tried one, but I'm interested in trying one, Al/goratory offered me to try his, I'm going to take him up on that offer.



toggletoggle post by powerkok   at Sep 1,2004 1:52am
george, it was prolly simple eq'ing in the studio, or maybe he uses a graphic eq...it could be a million things.
Tube heads rule. Theres 12 tubes in my fucking mammoth 100 lb head.



toggletoggle post by gonzofiles   at Sep 1,2004 3:24am
hey everyone has an opinion, i like it



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Sep 1,2004 8:10am edited Sep 1,2004 8:12am
I don't...
though once while terence was playing his guitar, I touched it.

that's right bitches, terence, from fucking ascendancy! I know you all want to touch the hand of the man that touched terence's (from fucking ascendancy) guitar, stand in line.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Sep 1,2004 8:53am
RustedAngel said:
blue nli said:
mode four, meh. marshalls attempt at a dual rectifier in my opinion.



how is it an attempt at being a dual rec if the mode four doesn't even have a power tube section? all it has is a couple ecc83's.


i say this cus i feel marshall tried to take a stab at the 'gainy fuzz of death' sound that the rec pioneered(not a compliment). and they accomplished it, only fuzzier.



toggletoggle post by Kalopsia   at Sep 1,2004 5:55pm
the_reverend said:
I don't...
though once while terence was playing his guitar, I touched it.

that's right bitches, terence, from fucking ascendancy! I know you all want to touch the hand of the man that touched terence's (from fucking ascendancy) guitar, stand in line.


i already reserved a ticket



toggletoggle post by GORATORY not logged in at Sep 1,2004 10:43pm
I have seen threads about the mode four quite a bit with people bashing them. I personally think that it is the best head on the market for the kind of music we all play but if you like a really mid rangey tone then you are not going to be happy with it. I think that it is one of the few heads that can provide a scooped sound at a high volume and stand out in the mix. Many scooped sounds get lost in the mix so it is always hard to get clarity and I have never had a problem with the mode 4 with that. Also, as Tom said, Susuki uses one and even managed to get a nice mid range tone but as I said, it is not your best choice for mid range. For mid range I would recomend a Bogner. I want to know some of the things you guys don't like about the mode 4 if you guys could throw some of your opinions up on here.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Sep 1,2004 10:46pm
ive just felt like its way too fuzzy for me. not enough low end chunk, and too much of a rectifier clone sound.



toggletoggle post by RustedAngel at Sep 1,2004 10:48pm
the only other complaint I hear is from TUBE GURU's saying it doesn't compare to an all valve system, which even though I've never tried it I somewhat believe... That doesn't mean the amp would sound bad though.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Sep 1,2004 10:50pm
im far from a tube guru(duh if i use a pod pro), if it sounds good, it sounds good.



toggletoggle post by GORATORY not logged in at Sep 1,2004 10:56pm
the only all valve system I liked was Madison heads. Most all valves are weak souding in my own opinion. Not many people that do reveiws play death metal.

Blue nli - ive just felt like its way too fuzzy for me. not enough low end chunk, and too much of a rectifier clone sound

I just don't think you had enough time to fuck with it man. The left channel which is tubed, does have the rectifier sound but can get very gainy on scoop but the right side which is valve puts out an all low end chunk on scoop while maintaining clarity. Sit down with it for a while and I'm sure you'll get something you like out of it. It just sucks that at most guitar shops you can't really crank a head and really get to fuck with it cause the valve side, which is the good one, really doesn't get to its full potential untill cranked.



toggletoggle post by GORATORY not logged in at Sep 1,2004 10:58pm
THE ALL TIME BEST SOUND i have ever heard though was Severed Saivor's new rig with an Engl preamp. I had never heard Engl before but it blew me away.



toggletoggle post by blue nli at Sep 1,2004 11:41pm
yeah, engls kick ass. but i hate to toot my own horn, but my fav guitar sound has got to be ron kachnic(malignancy)'s sound, which happens to be from a line 6 podpro, which i very much endorse.



toggletoggle post by diamond_dave  at Sep 2,2004 4:49pm edited Sep 2,2004 4:51pm
strings have a huge part to play in your tone. the thicker the string, the thicker your tone is going to be. i use 14's. tuned down to B, it's the same tension as 11's in E, but the tone is way thicker. also, you HAVE to have lots of gain to sound the way those guys do. and if you run a tube amp, it has to be loud. tubes sound infinitely better (in my opinion) when they're pushed hard.
also, many people ignore this fact: your speakers have more to do with your sound than anything. celestions are a good all around choice. there are others that are good for a nice dark sound, i'm sure. celestions do me well.



toggletoggle post by RustedAngel at Sep 2,2004 4:52pm
diamond_dave said:
strings have a huge part to play in your tone. the thicker the string, the thicker your tone is going to be. i use 14's. tuned down to B, it's the same tension as 11's in E, but the tone is way thicker. also, you HAVE to have lots of gain to sound the way those guys do. and if you run a tube amp, it has to be loud. tubes sound infinitely better (in my opinion) when they're pushed hard.


tubes rule.

I use 11's tuned to B...

14's gad damn that's thick!



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:Icubating Norwegian Manbearpig
[default homepage] [print][8:47:44am Apr 26,2024
load time 0.01673 secs/15 queries]
[search][refresh page]