ghost%20of%20CJ%20Peppers said

susurrate said

Hoser said

susurrate said

truth: neither candidate will prevent anyone from listening to and playing music, and neither will prevent anyone from getting drunk and doing recreational drugs.

that being said, they're both awful but i don't see either affecting my quality of life in a way that i can't deal with.

as a gun owner, i am very concerned about clintons approach to gun control, but currently maura healey has already royally F'd that whole deal up for MA residents. i still highly doubt that anyone is at risk to losing an LTC through the matter, so all of us gun-law-abiding LTC holders will probably still be able to carry our semi-auto handguns and revolvers. I'd prefer the freedom of owning whichever weapon I'd like to purchase, whether it's for a useful nature, or just flexing my dick muscles. But you can't win 'em all.

I'll still carry a gun wherever I go. And I'll still carry two when I go into the city.

Voting is dumb.

A gun owner that does recreational drugs....I think I found the problem.

for the record, i do not. i was stating that the shit that i hear from many other metalheads regarding their super important concerns usually boil down to 'well as long as i can drink and do _____ i dont give a fuck who is president"

i get drug tested once a month randomly *for my job*, and i have better shit to do than waste money on garbage. especially considering all the people dropping like flies from the epidemic of heroin lately.

wut?