Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Headbanging_Man at 2011-05-05 18:44:43

I see the spacing, so I see now it wasn't directed at me... Does that preclude me from responding? A bunch of meaningless bromides about why the media exists and the fact that technology has opened the door to more opinions does come across as condescending to anyone past the 8th grade ("Once upon a time in history", come on!), and it seems directed, if anything at saying that sometimes the government lies, but sometimes it should be trusted. The implication was that it's OK to ask questions, but not WHACKJOB questions, with an underlying assumption that not swallowing the OBL death narrative equated to WHACKJOB questions. Yet if these questions are so whackjob, why not address them individually on their merits and prove it to be so?

[default homepage]

[print][

12:56:17am Apr 29,2024
load time 0.00752 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]