Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by brodown at 2011-03-28 14:54:24
ArrowHeadNLI said[orig][quote]
AFAIC - as far as i see


1) you say triggers cannot reproduce the dynamic range of real drums. I just linked MANY videos showing this to be untrue.

2) you say playing as hard as you can is difficult, and that triggers make it easier. I disagree. VELOCITY curves make it easier. If I turn mine off, guess what? I gotta hit as hard as I can TOO.



I'm really not trying to be a contrarian here...but now I'm thinking maybe I am I missing something.

Can a crescendo be performed on an electronic drum kit, or a triggered acoustic drum kit, in the same manner as an acoustic instrument? In my technical understanding, it cannot, but if I'm missing something, I wanna know!

I also should clarify what I mean by "dynamic range" in that context. I know that the overall signal level range can be matched (whether that's in acoustic power, voltage, or whatever.) What I'm aiming at is the difference between a continuously variable instrument and a discrete set of different intensity samples. It's the difference of ramps vs. steps.

As for your 2nd point...I'm not really sure what you're getting at there. Why use the triggers if not for that advantage?
[default homepage] [print][1:30:50pm Apr 29,2024
load time 0.00842 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]