Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by arkquimanthorn at 2011-02-22 10:41:06

WBC just reeks of another Waco in the womb. They can exercise any right to speech that they choose, but the thing that bothers me is they CLAIM their Christian, and it causes people to sweep them under the rug when we all know if they were any other religion they would have disappeared already.

I believe that just as Money = Speech, that hacking is also an exercise in free speech. ( http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20030624_sprigman.html ) Therefore I support Anonymous, even though their actions will have no effect.

Rights are indeed imaginary but if enough people recognize those rights regardless of whether a govt does or not, they become a palpable idea; when they define people's actions or goals, they are just short of physical reality.

Like the near-reality of "social conventions" i.e. anyone who interrupts funeral rites is just begging to get killed by somebody.

[default homepage]

[print][

12:52:56pm Jun 01,2024
load time 0.01115 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]