Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by |an at 2009-06-22 11:03:52
the_reverend said[orig][quote]
man... kids... why not read the article?

"The process used involved a camera that would take a set of three photographs. These pictures would be monochrome but each picture would be taken using a filter of a different color. When all three monochrome pictures were projected (using light which had to be specifically colored) then the original color scene could be reconstructed. However, this took some time to take - hardly the point and click we are used to a century on - and so occasionally in Prokudin-Gorsky's work you can see stray movements, such as the child in the bottom left of the previous picture."


I think we got that part, but it just comes down to semantics if you want to claim that that color pics are BW based on their source format.

That's like saying my 256 color GIF is really a 16.7k color image because the source was a JPEG. Besides, he actually did the work back then to convert them to color, not just took the pics in BW and then had them reconstructed a century later with modern techniques.
[default homepage] [print][7:18:38am May 07,2024
load time 0.00681 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]