Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by samYam at 2008-09-20 20:26:47

The premise for his argument makes total sense, and because of that he believes it. But he does not know the law here and it protects Gawker, a news organization, because of the first amendment. I've recently run into something very similar with a blog I do and have received a letter from a solicitors office trying to muscle me into taking an article down, telling me I have committed libel and am smearing the person who hired them. But all I did was get the article from a different site, and reposted it, unedited. So some judges and lawyers that I know have said I am perfectly within my right to do it, as Gawker is to repost the Palin e-mails.

So... sorry Bill but you're wrong, even though you make a decent argument this time.

[default homepage]

[print][

1:51:10pm Apr 28,2024
load time 0.02281 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]