Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by Mikeofdecrepitude at 2008-09-18 11:05:39
Everyone knows government sponsored terrorism is fictitious (just look at the declassified Gulf of Tonkin incident). I mean c'mon, Osama Bin Laden (who came from a wealthy and prestigious family; which certain members had ties to our government, like Salem Bin Laden, and the Saudi Royal family) and his Mujahideen faction, (who were supplied arms by the CIA and former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski to fight the Soviet invasion) that live in caves, have far more capabilities and resources to pull off a major attack like 9/11 than one of the richest and armed nations in the world.

Why did building 7 fall in a controlled demolition style when there was nothing more than a minor fire on the lower levels of the building? No building in history has collapsed because of something like that. Certain small groups of people made a fortune shorting airline & insurance stocks immediately before 9/11, which the media mentioned in passing after 9/11, but the investigation into this was dropped shortly afterwards (this isn't even scratching the surface of all the anomalies and odd occurrences of 9/11).

We used 9/11 as a pretext to invade Iraq, claiming Al-CIAda (the former Mujahideen) had ties to Saddam, on top of his hidden cache' of WMD's (which subsequently were never found, how convenient). In regards to Iraq, we no longer call them Al-CIAda anymore (since no connection could be made between Saddam's regime and Al-CIAda), but rather "insurgents", resorting to typical Orwellian doublespeak/think. So why did we invade Iraq again?
People who subscribe to principle of Occam's razor should do a bit more research and realize that a lot of things just don't add up. But these are just crackpot theories, and I really need to start getting my facts straight from Popular Mechanics, Fox News and other major media outlets.
[default homepage] [print][8:57:08am Apr 26,2024
load time 0.00686 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]