Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by ShadowSD at 2006-06-09 11:34:36

hungtableed said:

where is the outrage from her when Zarqawi's group blows up scores (often times surpassing 40-50) of Iraqi civilians just to kill one U.S. soldier or Marine?

Actually, out of everyone on rttp, I have seen her bring up her outrage at the death of Iraqi civilians more than anyone. You just believe that all her outrage should be saved soley for Zarqawi, and none of it should be directed towards Bush for putting American soldiers and civilians as targets in Iraq.

And yet, Nicholas Berg's father finds Bush more responsible for his son's death than Zarqawi. If you want to try to convince people that they should be more outraged that the VICTIM'S FATHER, good luck. Ann Coulter's been trying that with the 9/11 widows, how's that been working out?

hungtableed said:

I think that she just wants to gripe about our military because at heart even the most moderate liberal is anti-military. People that are anti-military have no balls - appeasement has never solved anything, war has!

According to your world view, it sounds like you have more in common with terrorists than you do with liberals. The Iraq war is anti-military, because it is hurting our army and our future ability to defend our country, yet you still support it blindly. That's not pro-military, it's pro-militant, and it's the kind of attitude we need to fight AGAINST to win the war on terror.

[default homepage]

[print][

6:31:55am Apr 28,2024
load time 0.02464 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]