Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by ArrowHead nli at 2006-01-09 17:49:24

DomesticTerror said:

i do agree that it makes no sense at all why they would screen for THC, but not harder drugs. (seeing how it's CVS, maybe painkillers would be a good idea!)

Makes perfect sense.

Pot is the easiest, cheapest, and legally most justifiable drug to test for. A folicle test can be 200% more expensive, and since usage from years past can be detected it's more easily challenged in court. Federal agencies, like the FBI, do folicle tests and will not hire anyone who has done ANY illegal drugs within the past 15 years.

As for why they test for THC at all, that's pretty sensible too. You're in a pharmacy. Someone who tests positive for recreational drug use is a lot more likely to steal prescription meds than someone who does not. Same reason it's a bad idea to hire a fat chick to guard a box of donuts.

[default homepage]

[print][

12:28:28am May 29,2024
load time 0.02695 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]