|
New site? Maybe some day. 
|
|
I have to say something: quality over quantity.
This site is such a mess. |
|
|
uh dude, quality+quantity=www.returntothepit.com |
|
|
where else is there to go?
nowhere dickface, you anonymous pussy. |
|
|
anonymous loser/idiot makes it a "news story" |
|
|
When you have a 60 gig server you can do whatever the fuck you want right? |
|
|
anonymous people are a waste |
|
|
I think the quality is just fine. I do however, think Return to the Pit should have more actual pit shots. The name is a bit misleading.
It doesn't really matter anyways since Aaron's the only one doing any site like this so it's not like he has to compete with anyone. He's having a good time and so aren't we. If you don't agree, Oh, than go to more shows and take your own pictures. |
|
|
go back to Lambgoat you anonymous, worthless fucking sack of shit. |
|
|
Fuck Off and Die. Artsy Fartsy Fag. |
|
|
Blackout said: | I do however, think Return to the Pit should have more actual pit shots. The name is a bit misleading. |
Yes, let's all look at photos of sweaty men dancing. |
|
|
My post wasn't an insult, just a suggestion, although you got me there, but your saying instead of having pictures of sweaty men dancing we should have pictures of sweaty men playing guitars?
|
|
|
Blackout said: My post wasn't an insult, just a suggestion, although you got me there, but your saying instead of having pictures of sweaty men dancing we should have pictures of sweaty men playing guitars?
|
lol good comeback
i would like to see more "pit" shots, mainly because i'm curious of the crowd turnouts at all these shows. |
|
|
I think Aaron should get shots of the guitar/bass rigs for all the bands if he could. Not that he doesn't already, but I mean the amps themselves. I wanna know what other people are using. |
|
|
it would be one thing if that guy offered constructive criticism, but his post made no sense. i agree with the people who are saying this site has quality and quantity. in the past, it was hard to find pictures sometimes, but there have been modifications made to this site that make it easy. i know exactly where to find pictures when i want to find them, and the quality of the photography is 100% professional. there's nothing to complain about as far as the quality and quantity of images. why doesn't that kid try his hand at making a site that serves the local metal and hardcore community as well as this site does? i guarantee it isn't easily done. |
|
|
Keep taking millions of shitty pictures of shitty bands. No one cares. |
|
|
everybody wants something. fuck everyone. keep on keep'n on. |
|
|
Blackout said: I think the quality is just fine. I do however, think Return to the Pit should have more actual pit shots. The name is a bit misleading.
It doesn't really matter anyways since Aaron's the only one doing any site like this so it's not like he has to compete with anyone. He's having a good time and so aren't we. If you don't agree, Oh, than go to more shows and take your own pictures. |
The name is a reference to another radio program that was called "The Pit".
He has an article about it somewhere on this site. |
|
|
anonymous666 said: | Keep taking millions of shitty pictures of shitty bands. No one cares. |
how many hits does this site get every day?
Don't you know? or are you just running your mouth about somehting you don't know anything about? |
|
|
anonymous666 said: | Keep taking millions of shitty pictures of shitty bands. No one cares. |
if The Rev's pics are shitty, I want to see some of your "QUALITY" photographs... since you're the do-all - end-all - be-all photo critic, you should be able to produce some top quality shots of your own... that is if you even know what a camera is...
so unless you can show us ALL what "QUALITY" photos are supposed to look like, I suggest you shut the fuck up. 
I hope you slip on a puddle of AIDS |
 
| [default homepage]
|
[print][ | 3:39:08am Apr 24,2024
load time 0.01503 secs/15 queries] | [search] | [refresh page] |
|
