Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Anyone considering the upgrade to Windows Vista? by DreamingInExile on Jan 31,2007 1:34pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Jan 31,2007 1:34pm
if you're not a pirate, and looking to buy a copy of Vista Ultimate Edition, consider getting an OEM copy, it's almost $200 cheaper then the retail box version.

http://www.softwaremedia.com/product/2962.html

as opposed to:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?sk...&type=product&cp=1&id=1158317974609




toggletoggle post by SteveOTB   at Jan 31,2007 3:19pm edited Jan 31,2007 3:20pm
Yeah I don't trust OEM copies anymore.

My Adobe Photoshop here at work stopped working. It kept freezing on the opening screen so what did I do? I took the necessary steps to fixing it by researching the problem through Adobe and try to fix it. So I fixed it and then it says to me "I need to re-register because the settings were changed" I was like "ok that's fine, I've done this at home before no problem". So I tried re-registering it and it came up as "invalid serial number" everytime so I called Adobe up and they said "we don't have that serial number on file" turns out that my boss is a cheap ass who buy programs through OEM so I tried contacting the company to get a new serial number and found out they were out of business. So I told me boss, he went crazy on me from 3pm-8pm, and gave me a pay cut...never again.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 9:04am
DO YOU HEAR THAT PEOPLE? OEM SOFTWARE = PAY CUTS!



toggletoggle post by RichHorror  at Feb 1,2007 9:08am edited Feb 1,2007 9:10am
I like ice cream.



toggletoggle post by FuckIsMySignature at Feb 1,2007 9:11am
Only if it supports Skynet.



toggletoggle post by Messerschmitt at Feb 1,2007 9:12am
no



toggletoggle post by Granny_Monster at Feb 1,2007 9:14am
RichHorror said:
I like ice cream.


Yeah? Well, I LOVE ice cream!



toggletoggle post by RichHorror  at Feb 1,2007 9:15am
It's on like Red Dawn.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 9:17am
I will at some point. would need a new computer.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 9:35am
the_reverend said:
I will at some point. would need a new computer.


same here... it's going to cost me a fortune to upgrade though, since I'm a gamer, I'd need a DX10 video card, anf the only ones out now are the GeForce 8800 series, and they're around $600 currently...

on top of that, I'd need a new PCI-Express motherboard, which requires getting a new Processor and Ram, another SATA HDD (since most new motherboards only have one IDE channel), a new power supply (mine's old) and a new case (seeing that I put my foot through the front of my other case the other night)

so, to upgrade to Vista, it's going to cost me $1500+ for a new box, then another $200 for the OS...

fucking figures



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 9:38am
get one SATA hd and then USB for the IDE drives. ez pz.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 9:48am
the_reverend said:
get one SATA hd and then USB for the IDE drives. ez pz.


well, yeah, the IDE's that I have (2x 60GB and 1x 40GB) will be moved to my Linux box.

I've got a WD Raptor SATA drive now, I'm probably going to get 2 new ones and run them RAID 0 (I back up everything onto my External once every two weeks (manually, I need an automated program to do this, any suggestions?) and once a month I burn a backup of my backup to DVD.

I also know that SATA ROM drives are starting to trickle into the market, and I may consider going with those, as long as theyre not super exensive and work better then standard IDE ROM drives.

I'm going to be picking out my new case soon, and starting to get components slowly, so by the time I'm ready to upgrade to a DX10 card, they may be affordable... HAHAHAHAHA



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 9:53am
2 60 and 1 40? what year are you living in? 2000? damn... SATA SSD's is that what you are talking about? ROM would make much sense to use.

as far as an auto-back up, all you need in the linux world is rsync.
in the windows world, microsoft synctoys.
and crossing linux to windows and vice versa, um.. Unison?



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 10:25am
the_reverend said:
2 60 and 1 40? what year are you living in? 2000?


no, those are just idle storage drives in my box right now. (backups, art, videos, software)

I keep my OS on my 120GB SATA drive.

the 40 is sitting on my desk right now, not plugged in.

but, like I said, it's time for an upgrade



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 10:37am
you are just wasting energy, asshat. get 1 500GB SATA drive ($150 @ newegg) and keep those old drives turned off. 10w for 500GB or 30w for 180GB.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 10:45am
I don't pay for electricity, it's included in my rent... asshat... (not that you'd know that, but I felt like calling you an asshat :-P )

I'm still up in the air over what I'm doing as far as storage still. like I said, I'm only going to be getting parts sloooowly (over the next few months)

drives are #4 on my list of parts to buy (Case & PS are #1, Motherboard & CPU are #2 & #3)



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 10:52am
way to kill the environement, asshat. just cause you can shit every where doesn't mean you should.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 10:55am edited Feb 1,2007 10:56am
:-P

so, I'm guessing you'd be opposed to me getting 1KW power supplies for all the computers in my house?

haha, no, in all seroiusness, I'm looking to cut overall typical power consumption in my new PC so when I game, and things come under a heavy load, I have ample power above and beyond what I need for remedial tasks to overcompensate for power demand.



toggletoggle post by toothy at Feb 1,2007 11:02am
fucking hippies



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 11:05am
1kw for a computer that only pulls 300w is wicked inefficient. you want to run as close to you ps's rating as possible. I want to run all mobile chips at home to keep idling machines on the power downlow.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 11:11am
the_reverend said:
1kw for a computer that only pulls 300w is wicked inefficient. you want to run as close to you ps's rating as possible.


yeah, this is very true, I was completely joking about runnign a 1KW power supply (not only for inefficiency, but they're like insanely expensive as well). I do need to float somewhere around the 500watt mark though, as most of nVidia's top end gaming cards require at least a 430.

the_reverend said:
I want to run all mobile chips at home to keep idling machines on the power downlow.


I'd do that, but like I said I'm a gamer and the mobile CPU's aren't quite enough for high end gaming. if my wife dosen't gets a PC insted of a laptop (which I doubt she will) I'd build it with one of the mobile chips (she dosen't do all that much with her computer, just stuff for work and a little surfing.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 1,2007 11:15am
hm.. play doom on your iPod and eat shit.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 11:21am
if I had doom on my ipod, I would play it all the time...

I'll save the poop eating for this lucky individual:



toggletoggle post by thegreatspaldino   at Feb 1,2007 11:41am
I have a few things to share with you.

1. Vista upgrades require the presence of XP or 2000.

This will make disaster recovery hard because not only do you have to reinstall Vista, but you also have to reinstall XP. This is a change from previous versions witch require a valid license key.
Source: Slashdot

2. Michael Geist, a professor of law at the University of Ottowa, has this to say about the fine print:

On the EULA

Vista's legal fine print includes extensive provisions granting Microsoft the right to regularly check the legitimacy of the software and holds the prospect of deleting certain programs without the user's knowledge. During the installation process, users "activate" Vista by associating it with a particular computer or device and transmitting certain hardware information directly to Microsoft.

Even after installation, the legal agreement grants Microsoft the right to revalidate the software or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components. In addition, it sets significant limits on the ability to copy or transfer the software, prohibiting anything more than a single backup copy and setting strict limits on transferring the software to different devices or users.

On software and Windows Defender

Vista also incorporates Windows Defender, an anti-virus program that actively scans computers for "spyware, adware, and other potentially unwanted software." The agreement does not define any of these terms, leaving it to Microsoft to determine what constitutes unwanted software.

Once operational, the agreement warns that Windows Defender will, by default, automatically remove software rated "high" or "severe," even though that may result in other software ceasing to work or mistakenly result in the removal of software that is not unwanted.

For greater certainty, the terms and conditions remove any doubt about who is in control by providing that "this agreement only gives you some rights to use the software. Microsoft reserves all other rights." For those users frustrated by the software's limitations, Microsoft cautions that "you may not work around any technical limitations in the software."

On HD-DVD and Blu-Ray playback

Last December, Peter Guttman, a computer scientist at the University of Auckland in New Zealand released a paper called "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection." The paper pieced together the technical fine print behind Vista, unraveling numerous limitations in the new software seemingly installed at the direct request of Hollywood interests.

Guttman focused primarily on the restrictions associated with the ability to play back high-definition content from the next-generation DVDs such as Blu-Ray and HD-DVD (referred to as "premium content").

He noted that Vista intentionally degrades the picture quality of premium content when played on most computer monitors.

Guttman's research suggests that consumers will pay more for less with poorer picture quality yet higher costs since Microsoft needed to obtain licences from third parties in order to access the technology that protects premium content (those licence fees were presumably incorporated into Vista's price).

Moreover, he calculated that the technological controls would require considerable consumption of computing power with the system conducting 30 checks each second to ensure that there are no attacks on the security of the premium content.

Microsoft responded to Guttman's paper earlier this month, maintaining that content owners demanded the premium content restrictions. According to Microsoft, "if the policies [associated with the premium content] required protections that Windows Vista couldn't support, then the content would not be able to play at all on Windows Vista PCs." While that may be true, left unsaid is Microsoft's ability to demand a better deal on behalf of its enormous user base or the prospect that users could opt-out of the technical controls.
Source" Toranto Star via Slashdot

3. If you are a small business in the UK, Microsoft will come after you if they think you are pirating their software, and having an origonal disks, licensing, and even the box won't be enough.
Source: Slashdot



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 12:06pm
I <3 slashdot



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 12:29pm
thegreatspaldino said:
This will make disaster recovery hard because not only do you have to reinstall Vista, but you also have to reinstall XP. This is a change from previous versions witch require a valid license key.


I've used XP Pro upgrade discs and all they make you do is chuck in an XP or 2Kpro disc when they ask during the install. No previous install or key validation required.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 12:32pm
thegreatspaldino said:
or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components


That's the same with XP.



toggletoggle post by DreamingInExile   at Feb 1,2007 12:35pm
menstrual_sweatpants_disco said:
thegreatspaldino said:
or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components


That's the same with XP.


unless you have a volume licensed edition of XP



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 12:38pm
thegreatspaldino said:
Last December, Peter Guttman, a computer scientist at the University of Auckland in New Zealand released a paper called "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection." The paper pieced together the technical fine print behind Vista, unraveling numerous limitations in the new software seemingly installed at the direct request of Hollywood interests.

Guttman focused primarily on the restrictions associated with the ability to play back high-definition content from the next-generation DVDs such as Blu-Ray and HD-DVD (referred to as "premium content").

He noted that Vista intentionally degrades the picture quality of premium content when played on most computer monitors.


I don't know why this guy is badmouthing Vista for the restrictions within HDCP. It's going to be the new standard within HDDVD and BD titles. Microsoft is giving the user an option to watch an HDCP protected movie by adding support for it in Vista.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 12:42pm
DreamingInExile said:
menstrual_sweatpants_disco said:
thegreatspaldino said:
or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components


That's the same with XP.


unless you have a volume licensed edition of XP


Yeah but you usually only run into that issue if you're deploying images to multiple machines. Wouldn't you run sysprep in that case anyway?



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 1,2007 12:44pm edited Feb 1,2007 1:50pm
Wait, are you saying that doesn't happen (the "I see your hardware has changed, time to re-activate" thing) if you have a corp key for XP? I may have read that wrong.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 27,2007 7:44pm



toggletoggle post by hungtableed at Feb 27,2007 8:26pm
I just upgraded to XP. WTF.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 10:32am edited Feb 28,2007 10:33am
I've been dual booting between XP and Vista. I mostly always use XP but fuck around with Vista occasionally. Even with Aero turned off, windows classic theme enabled, and all of the bells and whistles disabled in performance options (like gay animated window rollups and dumb fading shit when you minimize windows (all the shit I disable in XP)), it still runs so fucking slow. My physical memory usage is always like 800MB or above and the CPU is always hovering around 60%, even when I'm idle. If I open an IE window or something the CPU always stays cranked at 100%. Seeings how Vista is offering me nothing that XP doesn't already have, that's kind of lame.



toggletoggle post by watchmaker666  at Feb 28,2007 11:14am
bloatware



toggletoggle post by largefreakatzero at Feb 28,2007 11:16am
No upgrading yet. I just bought my wife a new Sony laptop, and I made sure to get one with XP, not Vista. The way I look at it, is you never buy the first model year of a new car -- they need a year to get the bugs out.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 1:29pm
Probably not a bad way to look at it.



toggletoggle post by metal_church101  at Feb 28,2007 2:15pm
I am staying with Windows XP for as long as I can.



toggletoggle post by sinistas   at Feb 28,2007 2:18pm edited Feb 28,2007 2:18pm
I installed a third-party sidebar app, and I'm sticking with that. Fuck Vista.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 28,2007 2:23pm
I will.. but I'm going to need a quantum processor first. seeing as the only quantum processor is currently 16bits.. I'm going to need a few billion more first.



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 4:58pm edited Feb 28,2007 4:59pm
I couldn't help but think with this "Fuck Vista" attitude I've had recently, that I've been acting like those douche bag holier-than-thou fuckers who refuse to update to XP and swear by Windows 2000 Professional. I've remembered an important fact, though. I didn't suffer a dramatic performance decrease with virtually nothing to gain otherwise when I switched from 2kpro to XP. I liked 2kpro a lot, but 2kpro had a lot of software compatibility issues. XP seemed to solve those problems, was virtually the same as 2kpro in all the areas I liked, and even added easier driver handling and other administrative tidbits.

Now that I remember those facts, I can go back to my previous attitude.
Fuck those diehard win2kpro douche bags.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 28,2007 6:09pm
I didn't want to chnge to 95 from 3.11 cause "i had to have Dos!"

win95 runs around 32mb of ram
win98/me runs around 64mb of ram
win2K runs around 128mb of ram.
winxp runs around 256mb of ram.
vista runs around 512mb of ram.

notice a trend?



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 6:20pm
are you sure about that 512 number? I have a gig of RAM and I'm using the vast majority of it even when idling.



toggletoggle post by dertoxia   at Feb 28,2007 8:41pm
vista runs best with 4GB of ram



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 8:59pm
haha I'm sure you're serious too



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 28,2007 9:11pm
the minimum for vista is 512MB



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 28,2007 9:11pm
XP doesn't use more than 1GB well.



toggletoggle post by the_reverend   at Feb 28,2007 9:13pm
I have 2 computers with 2GB and 1 with 3gb and when you get over 1.1GB, they all start swapping like crizzazzzy



toggletoggle post by dertoxia   at Feb 28,2007 9:17pm



toggletoggle post by menstrual_sweatpants_disco   at Feb 28,2007 9:28pm
the_reverend said:
I have 2 computers with 2GB and 1 with 3gb and when you get over 1.1GB, they all start swapping like crizzazzzy


What do you mean? It starts thrashing to the disk?



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:watch out for plagues of locusts
[default homepage] [print][1:07:34am Apr 25,2024
load time 0.03527 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]