Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Future Society by infoterror on Apr 18,2006 5:55pm
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by infoterror  at Apr 18,2006 5:55pm
Civilizations start with a few leaders who conceive the otherwise unknown notion of working together in organization, thus achieving efficiency and better lives.

Over time people take this for granted; then breeding breaks down, then ideology breaks down and moves from a transcendental "we could make things better" to a materialistic "let's divide up what we have." This leads to purely economic, utilitarian systems of government/society. From this comes further dysgenics, followed by race-mixing et cetera.

At this time, our society is bloated with parasites.

The ability to see the need to make civilization where none exists starts ~120 IQ points, but more properly in the 130-170 IQ range.

For this reason, all of our fighting over political systems is irrelevant: our true problem is a loss of higher intelligence. Our population averages are now about 103 IQ (IQ is not a perfect measurement, but close enough for demographic-statistical purposes).

I propose a society of only those 120 and higher, and the extermination of all below 120 (they will inevitably revolt, wanting what more intelligent people have and lacking the brains to see they will be killing the goose that laid the golden egg, as has happened in our society).

This society will stabilize over a generation and then have time to remove those lacking nobility of character, and to breed its ugly people into healthier-looking ones.

Thoughts?

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=6275



toggletoggle post by anonymous at Apr 18,2006 6:07pm



toggletoggle post by Man_of_the_Century at Apr 19,2006 8:44am
High IQ doesn't mean the person is a better human being. For example (these are estimations, ask if you want the link):
Adolf Hitler (140)
George W. Bush (125 - he made the cut)
Richard Nixon (135)
Al Capone (200)
Theodore Kaczynski (170 at age 10)
Richard Loeb (160)
Nathan Leopold (210 as a child)
Charles Manson (121, but testers believe he did not take the test seriously)

The problem is not the dumb people, its the smart ones that talk the dumb ones into doing what they want.



toggletoggle post by davefromthegrave  at Apr 19,2006 9:13am
wow. the year 2000 is gonna be really neat.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:skynet is always watching protecting you
[default homepage] [print][12:39:48pm Apr 19,2024
load time 0.00949 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]