New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Select Color
orange
orange-red
crimson
red
firebrick
dark red
green
limegreen
teal
silver
sea-green
deeppink
tomato
coral
purple
indigo
burlywood
sandy brown
sienna
chocolate
FONT
XXSmall
XSmall
Small
Medium
Large
XL
XXL
:DG:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Char
†
‡
‰
♠
♣
♥
♦
‾
←
↑
→
↓
™
–
—
¡
¢
£
¤
¥
¦
§
¨
©
ª
«
¬
®
¯
°
±
²
³
´
µ
¶
·
¸
¹
º
»
¼
½
¾
¿
À
Á
Â
Ã
Ä
Å
Æ
Ç
È
É
Ê
Ë
Ì
Í
Î
Ï
Ð
Ñ
Ò
Ó
Ô
Õ
Ö
×
Ø
Ù
Ú
Û
Ü
Ý
Þ
ß
à
á
â
ã
ä
å
æ
ç
è
é
ê
ë
ì
í
î
ï
ð
ñ
ò
ó
ô
õ
ö
÷
ø
ù
ú
û
ü
ý
þ
ÿ
b
i
u
add:
url
image
video
(
?
)
Message:
UBB
enabled
. HTML
disabled
Spam Filtering
enabled
Icons: (click image to insert)
Show All
-
pop
:
post by
arktouros
at 2009-09-18 15:06:07
As far as international cabals, NWO, large-scale alien conspiracies, Alex Jones BS, I don't buy any of that stuff. Conspiracies that do exist, Pentagon Papers, 9/11, etc. lead me to believe that most others are NOT true because many aspects of these "conspiracies" were so poorly overlooked that the fallacy of individuals is to blame. I believe it's entirely possible that certain groups of the government were involved in 9/11 indirectly, because the amount of discrepancies in all aspects of events surrounding it. But in general, the larger the scale of the conspiracy, the lesser amount of credibility it has. Bilderberg Group, for example. Conspiracy theories emerged from that specifically because it's restricted to outsiders, and only from there people have made outlandish allegations. It's the same inclusive false logic that allows a God to exist simply because it's not proven (arguably) that he doesn't exist - the root of all conspiracy theories.
All that said, I fucking love X-Files.
[
default homepage
]
[
print
][
5:40:12pm May 26,2024
load time 0.03122 secs/10 queries]
[
search
]
[
refresh page
]